AI-Generated Feedback and Second Language Writing Development: A Longitudinal Investigation of Learner Autonomy, Accuracy, and Affective Response in Higher Education Contexts
Keywords:
automated written corrective feedback, second language writing, learner autonomy, writing anxiety, EFL, longitudinal research, higher educationAbstract
This longitudinal mixed-methods study investigates the long-term impact of AI-generated feedback tools such as ChatGPT and Grammarly on undergraduate EFL/ESL learners’ academic writing development over three academic years[1][2]. Addressing gaps in existing automated written corrective feedback (AWCF) research, the study examines three key dimensions: linguistic development, learner autonomy, and affective outcomes. Approximately 80 university students will be tracked across six semesters through quantitative measures of syntactic complexity, lexical diversity, error frequency, writing anxiety, self-efficacy, and foreign language enjoyment, alongside qualitative data from interviews, reflective journals, stimulated recall sessions, and screen-capture logs. The study aims to provide deeper insight into how learners engage with AI-generated feedback and how it influences their revision practices, long-term interlanguage development, and emotional responses to writing. Ultimately, the research seeks to contribute to theories of AI-mediated second language acquisition and offer practical recommendations for integrating AI and human feedback effectively in higher education L2 writing instruction.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
